Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition

No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition

Date: Oct 13, 2025
No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition Case: Mohammed Taiyab and Others v. State of Madhya...
MP High Court clarifies: No automatic forfeiture of gratuity for dismissed bank officers; Payment of Gratuity Act overrides service regulations; conviction required for ‘moral turpitude’ forfeiture

MP High Court clarifies: No automatic forfeiture of gratuity for dismissed bank officers; Payment of Gratuity Act overrides service regulations; conviction required for ‘moral turpitude’ forfeiture

Date: Oct 10, 2025
MP High Court clarifies: No automatic forfeiture of gratuity for dismissed bank officers; Payment of Gratuity Act overrides service regulations; conviction required for ‘moral turpitude’ forfeiture...
Suicide Video Naming Alone Not Sufficient to Deny Bail in Loan-Linked Abetment Cases: MP High Court Clarifies under BNSS Sections 482/483

Suicide Video Naming Alone Not Sufficient to Deny Bail in Loan-Linked Abetment Cases: MP High Court Clarifies under BNSS Sections 482/483

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Suicide Video Naming Alone Not Sufficient to Deny Bail in Loan-Linked Abetment Cases: MP High Court Clarifies under BNSS Sections 482/483 Case Commentary on: Arvind Parmar v. The State of Madhya...
Unauthorized Absence Requires Proof of Willfulness: Non-consideration of Medical Defence Vitiates Disciplinary Orders

Unauthorized Absence Requires Proof of Willfulness: Non-consideration of Medical Defence Vitiates Disciplinary Orders

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Unauthorized Absence Requires Proof of Willfulness: Non-consideration of Medical Defence Vitiates Disciplinary Orders Case: Roop Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others (W.P. No. 4426/2021)...
Litigant Not to Suffer for Counsel’s Lapse; MP High Court Pilots a “Social Audit” Restorative Measure While Restoring a 14-Year-Old Writ

Litigant Not to Suffer for Counsel’s Lapse; MP High Court Pilots a “Social Audit” Restorative Measure While Restoring a 14-Year-Old Writ

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Litigant Not to Suffer for Counsel’s Lapse; MP High Court Pilots a “Social Audit” Restorative Measure While Restoring a 14-Year-Old Writ Introduction Case: Sushil Verma v. Madhya Pradesh Industrial...
Administrative Disarray Is No Ground to Reject Judicial Applications: MP High Court Reaffirms Duty to Pass Speaking, Merit-Based Orders under Article 227

Administrative Disarray Is No Ground to Reject Judicial Applications: MP High Court Reaffirms Duty to Pass Speaking, Merit-Based Orders under Article 227

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Administrative Disarray Is No Ground to Reject Judicial Applications: MP High Court Reaffirms Duty to Pass Speaking, Merit-Based Orders under Article 227 Case: Parameshwari Developers Pvt. Ltd....
Anticipatory bail under BNSS Section 482 hinges on necessity of custodial interrogation, not gravity of allegation alone: MP High Court in Qureshi & Patidar v. CBI (Fake Encounter Probe)

Anticipatory bail under BNSS Section 482 hinges on necessity of custodial interrogation, not gravity of allegation alone: MP High Court in Qureshi & Patidar v. CBI (Fake Encounter Probe)

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Anticipatory bail under BNSS Section 482 hinges on necessity of custodial interrogation, not gravity of allegation alone: MP High Court in Qureshi & Patidar v. CBI (Fake Encounter Probe) Introduction...
Targeted deterrence against false POCSO accusations: MP High Court quashes FIR, directs prosecution of informant and mandates preliminary enquiry before coercive action in habitual-complainant scenario

Targeted deterrence against false POCSO accusations: MP High Court quashes FIR, directs prosecution of informant and mandates preliminary enquiry before coercive action in habitual-complainant scenario

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Targeted deterrence against false POCSO accusations: MP High Court quashes FIR, directs prosecution of informant and mandates preliminary enquiry before coercive action in habitual-complainant...
Intention Over Injury: MP High Court Reiterates Limits of Section 307 IPC in Sudden Quarrel with Wooden-Log Assault

Intention Over Injury: MP High Court Reiterates Limits of Section 307 IPC in Sudden Quarrel with Wooden-Log Assault

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Intention Over Injury: MP High Court Reiterates Limits of Section 307 IPC in Sudden Quarrel with Wooden-Log Assault Case: Himanshu Sarwan v. The State of Madhya Pradesh Citation: 2025 MPHC-IND 25453...
Mere Residence Is Not an “Integral Part” of Cause of Action under Article 226 in Anti-Defection Writs: MP High Court (Indore) Applies Forum Conveniens

Mere Residence Is Not an “Integral Part” of Cause of Action under Article 226 in Anti-Defection Writs: MP High Court (Indore) Applies Forum Conveniens

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Mere Residence Is Not an “Integral Part” of Cause of Action under Article 226 in Anti-Defection Writs: MP High Court (Indore) Applies Forum Conveniens Case: Umang Singhar v. The State of Madhya...
Attempted Self-Immolation as Per Se Mental Cruelty and the Inviolability of Mediation Confidentiality in Matrimonial Litigation — Commentary on Heeralal Meena v. Smt. Rama @ Rameti (2025 MPHC-JBP 40605)

Attempted Self-Immolation as Per Se Mental Cruelty and the Inviolability of Mediation Confidentiality in Matrimonial Litigation — Commentary on Heeralal Meena v. Smt. Rama @ Rameti (2025 MPHC-JBP 40605)

Date: Aug 27, 2025
Attempted Self-Immolation as Per Se Mental Cruelty and the Inviolability of Mediation Confidentiality in Matrimonial Litigation Commentary on Heeralal Meena v. Smt. Rama @ Rameti (2025 MPHC-JBP...
“Directory, Not Mandatory” – The Madhya Pradesh High Court Declares NEP-2020 Age Norms Relaxable for Exceptionally Meritorious Students

“Directory, Not Mandatory” – The Madhya Pradesh High Court Declares NEP-2020 Age Norms Relaxable for Exceptionally Meritorious Students

Date: Aug 26, 2025
“Directory, Not Mandatory” – The Madhya Pradesh High Court Declares NEP-2020 Age Norms Relaxable for Exceptionally Meritorious Students 1. Introduction The decision in Aarav Singh v. Union of India &...
“The Autonomy Cohabitation Doctrine” –  Madhya Pradesh High Court Affirms an Adult’s Right to Live-in with a Married Partner

“The Autonomy Cohabitation Doctrine” – Madhya Pradesh High Court Affirms an Adult’s Right to Live-in with a Married Partner

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“The Autonomy Cohabitation Doctrine” – Madhya Pradesh High Court Affirms an Adult’s Right to Live-in with a Married Partner 1. Introduction In Neeke Lal Mehra v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025...
Extending Benefit of Doubt in Age-Determination: Ossification Evidence Prevails over Unsubstantiated Birth Records — Commentary on Deul Kharole v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025)

Extending Benefit of Doubt in Age-Determination: Ossification Evidence Prevails over Unsubstantiated Birth Records — Commentary on Deul Kharole v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Extending Benefit of Doubt in Age-Determination: Ossification Evidence Prevails over Unsubstantiated Birth Records — Commentary on Deul Kharole v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) Introduction In Deul...
Planting Witnesses and Broken Chains: MP High Court Mandates Departmental Enquiry for Investigative Misconduct in Circumstantial-Evidence Prosecutions

Planting Witnesses and Broken Chains: MP High Court Mandates Departmental Enquiry for Investigative Misconduct in Circumstantial-Evidence Prosecutions

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Planting Witnesses and Broken Chains: MP High Court Mandates Departmental Enquiry for Investigative Misconduct in Circumstantial-Evidence Prosecutions 1. Introduction Nein Singh Dhurve v. State of...
Expedited Mandamus for Human-Rights Applications: Shamim Bano v. State of M.P.

Expedited Mandamus for Human-Rights Applications: Shamim Bano v. State of M.P.

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Expedited Mandamus to Quasi-Judicial Bodies: Commentary on Shamim Bano v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) 1. Introduction In Shamim Bano v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 MPHC-JBP 31432), the Madhya...
State-wide Enforcement Mandate Against Unauthorized Statue Installation on Public Property – Commentary on Rajesh Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025)

State-wide Enforcement Mandate Against Unauthorized Statue Installation on Public Property – Commentary on Rajesh Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
State-wide Enforcement Mandate Against Unauthorized Statue Installation on Public Property – Commentary on Rajesh Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 MPHC-IND 16939) 1. Introduction Rajesh Kumar...
Appellate-Stage CST ‘C-Form’ Disputes Are to Be Treated as “Disputed Amount” Cases under the M.P. Old Arrears Settlement Ordinance, 2020 – A Commentary on M/S Rathi Iron and Steel Industries Ltd. v. State of M.P. (2025)

Appellate-Stage CST ‘C-Form’ Disputes Are to Be Treated as “Disputed Amount” Cases under the M.P. Old Arrears Settlement Ordinance, 2020 – A Commentary on M/S Rathi Iron and Steel Industries Ltd. v. State of M.P. (2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Appellate-Stage CST ‘C-Form’ Disputes Are to Be Treated as “Disputed Amount” Cases under the Madhya Pradesh Old Arrears Settlement Ordinance, 2020 Introduction In M/S Rathi Iron and Steel Industries...
Capri Global Housing Finance v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) – Continuous Executive Duty to Re-Possess Secured Assets under Section 14 SARFAESI

Capri Global Housing Finance v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) – Continuous Executive Duty to Re-Possess Secured Assets under Section 14 SARFAESI

Date: Jul 2, 2025
Capri Global Housing Finance Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. (MP High Court, 1 July 2025) Continuous Executive Duty to Re-Possess Secured Assets under Section 14 SARFAESI 1. Introduction The...
Doctrine of Judicial Immunity & Proper-Forum Rule Reaffirmed – Comment on Kamlesh Chaturvedi v. Saksham Adhikari (MPHC, 2025)

Doctrine of Judicial Immunity & Proper-Forum Rule Reaffirmed – Comment on Kamlesh Chaturvedi v. Saksham Adhikari (MPHC, 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Doctrine of Judicial Immunity & Proper-Forum Rule Reaffirmed (Commentary on Kamlesh Chaturvedi v. Saksham Adhikari, MP High Court, 16-06-2025) 1. Introduction Court : High Court of Madhya Pradesh,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert